Francisco Jose Guevara Baro's dissertation
by
Francisco Jose Guevara Baro, Ph.D.
University of Texas at Austin, 1997
Supervisors: Mark A. Miller and Kamy Sepehrnoori
Accurate forecasting of the behavior of a reservoir recovery process
requires knowledge of geological information, fluid properties, and petrophysical
data. Because of the complexity of geological deposition and diagenesis, the
spatial distribution of these properties is very complex. Moreover, this
information is only known at well locations, which represent only a very small
fraction of the entire reservoir. In addition, many other parameters (such as initial
water saturation, residual oil saturation, relative permeability curve endpoints), are
not strictly deterministically known. A single reservoir description to obtain a
forecast of a reservoir process is thus not complete. Instead, a statistical forecast is
more appropriate. This statistical treatment would imply that many reservoir
descriptions should be generated. These reservoir images must usually be
processed through a finite-difference simulator for predictive purposes, requiring
unreasonably large amounts of computer time and human effort.
Two new methodologies for transferring uncertainty are presented in this
study. The first methodology, called the combination algorithm, uses simple
models (e.g., streamline, predictive or streamline finite-difference models) to rank
many equiprobable sets of single-valued reservoir stochastic parameters and
random permeability fields through an economic indicator value and a response
parameter, respectively. Then only a few sets of these parameters and fields,
corresponding to some cumulative probability values or selected points, are used
to run the complex model, from which an approximate NPV cumulative
distribution function is obtained.
The second methodology, called the ranking function algorithm, requires
sensitivity analysis from the complex model to generate a function that plays the
role of the simple model in the above methodology.
Polymer flooding was chosen as the process to be studied. This process
has sufficient complexity to be of interest, yet it is simple enough to provide early
insight.
These two methodologies are tested at three different levels, at test level
using a streamline model and predictive model, at full-process simulator level
using a predictive model and a commercial simulator, and at field scale with the
same models. The approximate cumulative distribution functions obtained at the
three levels and for both methodologies were reasonably accurate to ones obtained
from a direct Monte Carlo approach. The ranking function algorithm produced
lower errors than the combination algorithm at only slightly higher cost,
especially when sensitivity studies are to be conducted. Also, it is concluded that
multiple algorithm realizations are required to achieve an accurate cumulative
distribution function.
Back to theses index